|
Optimistic biases are thought to represent one example of an array
of self-serving beliefs that may influence behavior including
the illusion of control (Langer,
1975
xClose
Langer, E. J. (1975). The illusion of control. Journal
of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 311-328. ),
the better-than-average effect (e.g., Alicke
et al., 1995
xClose
Alicke, M. D., Klotz, M. L., Breitenbecher, D. L., Yurak,
T. J., & Vredenburg, D. S. (1995). Personal contact, individuation,
and the better-than-average effect. Journal of Personality
and Social Psychology, 68, 804-825. ), and the
uniqueness bias (Goethals,
Messick, & Allison, 1991
xClose
Goethals, G. R., Messick, D. M., & Allison, S. T. (1991).
The uniqueness bias: Studies of constructive social comparison.
In J. Suls & T. A. Wills (Eds.), Social comparison research:
Contemporary theory and research (pp. 149-176). NJ: Erlbaum.
). People who overestimate their ability to control
an outcome may engage in more risky decisions and behaviors
(Klein
& Kunda, 1994
xClose
Klein, W. M., & Kunda, Z. (1994). Exaggerated self-assessments
and the preference for controllable risks. Organizational
Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 59, 410-427. ).
Perceptions of control and self-efficacy represent key components
of many models such as Social Cognitive Theory (Bandura,
2001
xClose
Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective.
Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1-26. ) and
the Theory of Planned Behavior (Ajzen,
1991
xClose
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational
Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211. ),
highlighting the importance that biases in control and efficacy
beliefs might play in health behavior.
It is notable that optimistic beliefs and health threats
seem to be only weakly associated with dispositional
optimism (e.g., Goodman,
Chesney, & Tipton, 1995
xClose
Goodman, E., Chesney, M. A., Tipton, A. C. (1995). Relationship
of optimism, knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs to use of HIV
antibody testing by at-risk female adolescents. Psychosomatic
Medicine, 57, 541-546. ; Taylor
et al., 1992
xClose
Taylor, S. E., Kemeny, M. E., Aspinwall, L. G., Schneider,
S. G., Rodriguez, R., & Herbert, M. (1992). Optimism, coping,
psychological distress, and high-risk sexual behavior among
men at risk for acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS).
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63,
460-473. ), including when these optimistic beliefs
are biased (Radcliffe
& Klein, 2002
xClose
Radcliffe, N. M., & Klein, W. M. P. (2002). Dispositional,
unrealistic, and comparative optimism: Differential relations
with knowledge and processing of risk information and beliefs
about personal risk. Personality and Social Psychology
Bulletin, 28, 836-846. ). There is some evidence
that dispositional optimism may interact with optimistic bias
to magnify the detrimental effect of bias on information processing
(Davidson
& Prkachin, 1997
xClose
Davidson, K. & Prkachin, K. (1997). Optimism and unrealistic
optimism have an interacting impact on health-promoting behavior
and knowledge changes. Personality and Social Psychology
Bulletin, 23, 617-625. ), although in this study
optimistic bias was measured as a sum of risk estimates across
several events without use of an accuracy criterion. Generally,
people who are high in dispositional optimism (or a health-specific
form of optimism) are more knowledgeable, less defensive in
response to health information, and in better health (Aspinwall
& Brunhart, 1996
xClose
Aspinwall, L. G., & Brunhart, S. M. (1996). Distinguishing
optimism from denial: Optimistic beliefs predict attention
to health threats. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,
22, 993-1003. ; Scheier
& Carver, 1992
xClose
Scheier, M. F., & Carver, C. S. (1992). Effects of optimism
of psychological and physical well-being: Theoretical overview
and empirical update. Cognitive Therapy and Research,
16, 201-228. ), suggesting that dispositional
optimism and optimistic biases may have opposing effects (Radcliffe
& Klein, 2002
xClose
Radcliffe, N. M., & Klein, W. M. P. (2002). Dispositional,
unrealistic, and comparative optimism: Differential relations
with knowledge and processing of risk information and beliefs
about personal risk. Personality and Social Psychology
Bulletin, 28, 836-846. ).
Conclusions
Although much research has investigated the underlying causes
and moderators of optimistic biases, less work has addressed
how optimistically biased beliefs are related to health information
processing, behavior, and physical health outcomes. Moreover,
methodological problems make it difficult to determine how
biases in risk perceptions influence these outcomes relative
to other constructs in health behavior models such as attitudes
and self-efficacy (Weinstein,
2005
xClose
Weinstein, N. D. (2005). Misleading tests of health behavior
theories. Manuscript under review. ) as well as
less traditional constructs like affect (McCaul
& Mullens, 2003
xClose
McCaul, K.D., & Mullens, A.B. (2003). Affect, thought, and
self-protective health behavior: The case of worry and cancer
screening. In J. Suls and K. Wallston (Eds.), Social psychological
foundations of health and illness. Malden, MA: Blackwell
Publishers. ). In order to properly assess the impact
of optimistic biases, it is important to use accuracy criteria
that identify optimistic biases at the level of the individual.
The increasing availability of risk engines such as the Harvard
Risk Index (Colditz
et al., 2000
xClose
Colditz, G. A., Atwood, K. A., Emmons, K., Monson, R. R.,
Willett, W. C., Trichopoulos, D., & Hunter, D. J. (2000).
Harvard Report on Cancer Prevention Volume 4: Harvard Cancer
Risk Index. Cancer Causes and Control, 11, 477-488.
) and the use of prospective designs should facilitate
research taking this approach.
|